Privacy Policy for http://goodgovernmentgovernance.blogspot.com/
If you require any more information or have any questions about our privacy policy, please feel free to contact us by email at apemlegi@gmail.com.
At http://goodgovernmentgovernance.blogspot.com/, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us. This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by http://goodgovernmentgovernance.blogspot.com/ and how it is used.
Log Files
Like many other Web sites, http://goodgovernmentgovernance.blogspot.com/ makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol ( IP ) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider ( ISP ), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user’s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.
Cookies and Web Beacons
http://goodgovernmentgovernance.blogspot.com/ does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.
DoubleClick DART Cookie
.:: Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on http://goodgovernmentgovernance.blogspot.com/.
.:: Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to http://goodgovernmentgovernance.blogspot.com/ and other sites on the Internet.
.:: Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html
Some of our advertising partners may use cookies and web beacons on our site. Our advertising partners include ....
Google Adsense
These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on http://goodgovernmentgovernance.blogspot.com/ send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.
http://goodgovernmentgovernance.blogspot.com/ has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.
You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. http://goodgovernmentgovernance.blogspot.com/'s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.
If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browsers' respective websites.
Sunday, August 22, 2010
Primer on Records and Archives Management for Local Government
Replication Guidebook
Promotes the peer-to-peer methodology of disseminating and replicating exemplary practices (EPs) in local governance. As a how-to-guide, it provides information on how to manage a program that develops simple methodologies for the dissemination and replication of EPs in the Philippines from a national / regional perspective. It contains 1) the rationale for replication programs, 2) definition of terms and concepts and 3) the overall program development process. It also includes a stand-alone section on the replication process among LGUs at the local level, which can be distributed to LGUs wanting to share their EPs or wanting to replicate the EP of another LGU.
Cash for Corruption
Fortunately, there is a recent trend in the academic literature to explore the role of governance in development. Several development economists, many of whom are affiliated with the NBER Africa Project, have begun to examine the effect of incentives on governance outcomes in low-income countries. There are two common policy instruments used to reduce the incidence of corruption, in particular.
Governments have tried to establish financial incentives for performance and accountability. Most of the empirical literature supports the hypothesis that these conditional payments will reduce corruption, but there is one obvious wrinkle. Are monetary rewards really the solution for an already rich, greedy bureaucrat? Surely the amount of money that corrupt officials receive through bribes is far greater than the monetary value of the financial incentive for good governance. So, are these conditional cash payments really incentives, or are they disincentives? It is possible that the purely rational, profit-maximizing strategy would actually be to continue with the status quo of corruption. In other words, financial incentives might work for poor schoolteachers, but not for corrupt officials.
That's why incentive payments are often coupled with monitoring and accountability programs. The theory here is that sunlight is the best disinfectant for the stain left by corruption. A couple things have to work right for these programs to have their desired effect. Public infrastructure must be developed enough to conduct sufficient auditing. But, perhaps more importantly, monitoring programs are ultimately only as successful as the perceived strength of enforcement. What good is a finger wagging without actual punitive damages? If corrupt officials know that auditing systems are weak and punishment is severely delayed, then there is no reason to expect a change in their behavior.
We all know that corruption is a tough nut to crack. Social and economic development will require economists to get the incentives right. But it's not going to be as easy as giving out money or taking it away in places where cash is not just a currency, but also a language.
Applying principles of good governance to schools
Complex environment
Unlike traditional corporations, schools operate on a not-for-profit basis; its stakeholders have long term personal and emotional investments, relationships and friendships; participation in the school may cover many generations of family members; members of the Board participate on a voluntary basis; the school is engaged in the education, development and welfare of children; teachers are expected to be dedicated and provide a contribution well beyond the normal teaching day. Schools rely on family philanthropy, legacies and benefactors. It is not a simple matter for disaffected stakeholders to change allegiances. Changing schools can be a traumatic and expensive exercise.
It is pivotal to good governance that the Board recognises and manages the School’s main stakeholder groups. The management of stakeholders requires skill and tact and relationships must be delicately balanced at all times.
The main stakeholder groups are depicted in the following diagram:
Commercial directors
Some experienced company directors have difficulty in adjusting to the non-commercial environment of the School Board. The members of the Board have a wide range of interests, specialities, skills and background. They may not have experience in the corporate boardroom. They may not be financially or commercially focussed. They may be educationalists or religious nominees or representatives of parent or affiliate groups. The goals of the school extend well beyond financial performance. The company director must understand that the School Board is a different environment.
Parents
It is often the case that parents of current students sit on the School Board. This brings both benefits and difficulties.
Parent Board Members are alive to the issues of the day and can provide important feedback to the Board. They are energetic and anxious to ensure that the school meets the current and future needs of the students.
By the same token, parent Board Members are usually more accessible to stakeholders than non-parent Board Members and consequently may be subjected to greater pressure or scrutiny. It can be the case that parent Board Members are sought out by parents focussed on securing the best outcome for their particular child or their particular issue rather than looking at the interests of the school as a whole. Parent Board Members often become targets for those with complaints, grievances or causes. This is a common issue for School Boards and requires clear guidelines to assist Board Members on how to deal with such situations.
There is no universal model of good governance for schools. There can’t be as every situation is different and what suits one school may not suit another. Rather, good governance requires a review of the particular school’s unique context and culture. A governance structure will only be effective if it acknowledges the environment and particular context within which the school operates.
Relevant factors for consideration include:
* The school’s core values, history and culture
* The objectives and strategic direction of the school
* Individual personalities
* Interests of key stakeholders
o Current students and parents
o Former students and parents
o Prospective students and parents
o Affiliates (eg religious association)
o Government funders
o Benefactors
o Staff
o Local community
o Other relevant groups
* The size of the school
* Availability of suitable Board members and other resources.
In addition, a school’s governance framework must be reviewed and adopted to reflect changing environmental factors. The framework that constitutes good corporate governance for a school will evolve in light of the changing circumstances of the school and must constantly be tailored to suit those particular circumstances.
Unlike traditional corporations, schools operate on a not-for-profit basis; its stakeholders have long term personal and emotional investments, relationships and friendships; participation in the school may cover many generations of family members; members of the Board participate on a voluntary basis; the school is engaged in the education, development and welfare of children; teachers are expected to be dedicated and provide a contribution well beyond the normal teaching day. Schools rely on family philanthropy, legacies and benefactors. It is not a simple matter for disaffected stakeholders to change allegiances. Changing schools can be a traumatic and expensive exercise.
It is pivotal to good governance that the Board recognises and manages the School’s main stakeholder groups. The management of stakeholders requires skill and tact and relationships must be delicately balanced at all times.
The main stakeholder groups are depicted in the following diagram:
Some experienced company directors have difficulty in adjusting to the non-commercial environment of the School Board. The members of the Board have a wide range of interests, specialities, skills and background. They may not have experience in the corporate boardroom. They may not be financially or commercially focussed. They may be educationalists or religious nominees or representatives of parent or affiliate groups. The goals of the school extend well beyond financial performance. The company director must understand that the School Board is a different environment.
Parents
It is often the case that parents of current students sit on the School Board. This brings both benefits and difficulties.
Parent Board Members are alive to the issues of the day and can provide important feedback to the Board. They are energetic and anxious to ensure that the school meets the current and future needs of the students.
By the same token, parent Board Members are usually more accessible to stakeholders than non-parent Board Members and consequently may be subjected to greater pressure or scrutiny. It can be the case that parent Board Members are sought out by parents focussed on securing the best outcome for their particular child or their particular issue rather than looking at the interests of the school as a whole. Parent Board Members often become targets for those with complaints, grievances or causes. This is a common issue for School Boards and requires clear guidelines to assist Board Members on how to deal with such situations.
There is no universal model of good governance for schools. There can’t be as every situation is different and what suits one school may not suit another. Rather, good governance requires a review of the particular school’s unique context and culture. A governance structure will only be effective if it acknowledges the environment and particular context within which the school operates.
Relevant factors for consideration include:
* The school’s core values, history and culture
* The objectives and strategic direction of the school
* Individual personalities
* Interests of key stakeholders
o Current students and parents
o Former students and parents
o Prospective students and parents
o Affiliates (eg religious association)
o Government funders
o Benefactors
o Staff
o Local community
o Other relevant groups
* The size of the school
* Availability of suitable Board members and other resources.
In addition, a school’s governance framework must be reviewed and adopted to reflect changing environmental factors. The framework that constitutes good corporate governance for a school will evolve in light of the changing circumstances of the school and must constantly be tailored to suit those particular circumstances.
The Impact of Foreign Aid and Governance Agenda on Bangladesh
"Many of the recent ideas and concepts of 'good governance' and 'civil society' in Bangladesh have been generated by the international aid agencies and their 'good governance' policy agenda through foreign aid in the 1990s. But there are also local meanings to the terms derived from the independence struggle and the construction of a Bangladeshi state. The paper aims to obtain a clearer analytical understanding of the processes and institutions of civil society in Bangladesh that can develop workable strategy to improve governance for helping the poor through poverty reduction and moving beyond the patron-client relationships on which they have historically depended. It also focuses attention and debate on those aspects of indigenous governance in Bangladesh which can enhance the quality of governance and democracy by overcoming the Western top-down approach; and can strengthen the role of civil society organizations to further enhance their impact on better governance for fair distribution of public goods and ensuring social justice for the poor."
Corporate Social Responsibility
Speaking at the Conférence de Montréal (International Economic Forum of the Americas) on social responsibility of businesses on 5 June 2006, Mr McKinnon pointed out that corporate social responsibility benefits employees and their families, the local community and environment, as well as society.
"It's measurable in the 'triple bottom line' of financial, social and environmental performance. It attracts and keeps good staff, builds reputations, differentiates brands, reinforces what we call the 'licence to operate'," stated the Secretary-General.
He said governments can play a role in implementing and enforcing legislation to support the principles and practices of corporate social responsibility, which involves contributing to local community development in places where businesses operate. He noted corporate social responsibility can be encouraged through regulations, penalties and public sector institutions that control business investment or operations. Setting clear policy frameworks to guide business investment in corporate social responsibility and advising on issues such as the disclosure of information, tax incentives and encouraging dialogue with a company's stakeholders, is another way.
Mr McKinnon stated that public resources can be combined with those of business to address corporate social responsibility issues. He added that public support will also go a long way in promoting corporate social responsibility that is being practised by individual companies.
The Secretary-General commended the UK-led Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in which the Governments of Azerbaijan, Ghana, Kyrgyzstan and Nigeria commit to making public all their revenues for oil, gas and mining. He noted that some companies operating in Commonwealth countries have supported health care in the workplace and community, and offered scholarships for education and skills development.
Mr McKinnon stressed that both corporate governance and corporate social responsibility are significant drivers for economic development, with improved state enterprises leading to improved private enterprises.
In a separate forum on 'Governance and Leadership in Africa' that was held on the same day, the Secretary-General emphasised the importance of good governance and leadership in the development of the continent. While the international community had pledged last year to redouble its efforts for aid, debt relief and trade in Africa, Mr McKinnon highlighted Africa's commitment to plan and implement its own strategies to combat poverty, promote development and deepen democratisation. The aim was to provide just, efficient and transparent government across the continent to serve its citizens.
"Just as Africa was held back for a generation by despotic leaders and corrupt administrations, it now rejoices in a new generation of leaders and markedly better administrations," said the Secretary-General.
He stated that the Commonwealth works to support good governance in Africa through training programmes for public and private sector officials, and through the 'Good Offices' role of the Secretary-General by using diplomacy to prevent or resolve conflicts. He applauded the New Partnership for Africa's Development and its African Peer Review Mechanism but noted that less than half of the African Union countries have signed up to the latter -- with five of the 18 Commonwealth African countries yet to sign up.
Mr McKinnon said the Commonwealth is also promoting leadership in Africa through the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association and the Commonwealth Youth Programme, which assist in capacity-building.
Good Governance Reforms Agenda in Pakistan
Good Governance in Information Society Strategies
Information Society (IS) strategies are regarded today by policy-makers and stakeholders as powerful instruments for societal change, and for the building of competitive, equitable and sustainable knowledge economies.
Mandates have progressively broadened, and now pursue ambitious socio-economic objectives such as promoting sustainable economic growth, boosting productivity, creating employment opportunities and improving the effectiveness of public services and citizens’ quality of life.
Mandates have progressively broadened, and now pursue ambitious socio-economic objectives such as promoting sustainable economic growth, boosting productivity, creating employment opportunities and improving the effectiveness of public services and citizens’ quality of life.
Since IS strategies are multifaceted, complex, and large-scale, adequate governance frameworks and mechanisms are necessary to ensure that objectives, resources and tools are aligned to maximize results for end-users. The good governance of these strategies, then, depends on consideration for a number of issues such as: priority-setting, inclusion and consultation, cross-sectoral and governmental coordination, effective implementation tools, appropriate legal and regulatory frameworks, and monitoring performance. Getting these governance mechanisms right can be key determinants of success.
The case of Spain's Plan Avanza
At the request of the Spanish Government, the OECD is conducting a peer review of the country’s Plan Avanza strategy for the advancement of the Information Society. The aim of the report is two-fold. On one hand, it attempts to analyse how the Plan was designed and implemented, what its objectives and main targets are, and what governance mechanisms have been applied. On the other hand, it will focus on assessing the Plan’s impact on citizens, businesses and the public sector in Spain. The Peer Review is being conducted by the OECD’s Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate in collaboration with the OECD’s Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
Mandates have progressively broadened, and now pursue ambitious socio-economic objectives such as promoting sustainable economic growth, boosting productivity, creating employment opportunities and improving the effectiveness of public services and citizens’ quality of life.
Mandates have progressively broadened, and now pursue ambitious socio-economic objectives such as promoting sustainable economic growth, boosting productivity, creating employment opportunities and improving the effectiveness of public services and citizens’ quality of life.
The case of Spain's Plan Avanza
At the request of the Spanish Government, the OECD is conducting a peer review of the country’s Plan Avanza strategy for the advancement of the Information Society. The aim of the report is two-fold. On one hand, it attempts to analyse how the Plan was designed and implemented, what its objectives and main targets are, and what governance mechanisms have been applied. On the other hand, it will focus on assessing the Plan’s impact on citizens, businesses and the public sector in Spain. The Peer Review is being conducted by the OECD’s Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate in collaboration with the OECD’s Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
Dipolog Gateway Website
Campaign for Good Governance (CGG) is a registered national non-government organisation (NGO) advocating for good governance in Sierra Leone. Leaders of the pro-democracy movement formed CGG in 1996 after the first multi-party elections in three decades.
Narrowing Down Forest Governance Indicators
In 2009 a World Bank report called Roots for Good Forest Outcomes provided the framework for a comprehensive look at forest governance in terms of five building blocks and their principal components and subcomponents. As such, it provided a better insight into what constitutes “ideal” forest governance.
The next step was to develop a governance diagnostic tool which would help benchmark and pinpoint areas requiring reform.
APPROACH
A good diagnostic tool can establish a baseline for forest governance in specific countries and help identify areas for reform in a non-prescriptive manner, building consensus among stakeholders. Several agencies have begun developing such tools for monitoring REDD or Voluntary Partnership Agreements for example.
To avoid duplication of efforts, PROFOR and FAO are organizing a symposium in Stockholm on 13-14 September 2010 during which various forest agencies will work to define a common basket of indicators.
Field testing of governance-related questions in Uganda among public servants, academics, journalists, parliamentarians and private entrepreneurs took place in Kampala on 15-16 June, 2010. Similar field testing in 2-3 additional countries will help refine and finalize a forest governance diagnostic toolkit.
RESULTS
This activity is ongoing. Findings will be shared on this page when they become available. You can also follow us on twitter (twitter.com/forestideas) or subscribe to our mailing list for regular updates.
GGC
Mission
Recent global developments have strained transatlantic relations. They also have heightened tensions in the political and economic governance of the EU and the US. The Good Governance Consortium addresses these tensions with an innovative interdisciplinary curriculum and other activities.
Curriculum
The Consortium promotes the transatlantic exchange of students in political science, business administration, public affairs, international, and areas studies. The curriculum includes a web-assisted transatlantic course on good governance, elective courses in the areas of political and corporate governance, as well as elective area studies courses, and language instruction. Fieldwork paves the way for internships and enhances career-placement.
Conferences
The project includes two interdisciplinary, international public conferences: at the University of Illinois in October 2004 and in Vienna in the spring of 2006. The first focuses on globalizing governance in the transatlantic context. The second focuses on the status of EU governance in the transatlantic context.
Communication
The Consortium web platform enables transatlantic communication between students, faculty, and the public. It will become an interactive resource for educators and its components models for interactive, e-governance information and communication. It also serves as a communication center for faculty and student alumni.
Partners
The GGC unites leading scholars in government and law, political science, public policy and administration, business administration, cross-cultural management, and area studies. Its members represent a broad cross-section of EU and US culture. EU partners represent it from north to south and are from old and new states. US partners are large and small, representing the eastern, mid-west and southern regions.
Recent global developments have strained transatlantic relations. They also have heightened tensions in the political and economic governance of the EU and the US. The Good Governance Consortium addresses these tensions with an innovative interdisciplinary curriculum and other activities.
The Consortium promotes the transatlantic exchange of students in political science, business administration, public affairs, international, and areas studies. The curriculum includes a web-assisted transatlantic course on good governance, elective courses in the areas of political and corporate governance, as well as elective area studies courses, and language instruction. Fieldwork paves the way for internships and enhances career-placement.
Conferences
The project includes two interdisciplinary, international public conferences: at the University of Illinois in October 2004 and in Vienna in the spring of 2006. The first focuses on globalizing governance in the transatlantic context. The second focuses on the status of EU governance in the transatlantic context.
Communication
The Consortium web platform enables transatlantic communication between students, faculty, and the public. It will become an interactive resource for educators and its components models for interactive, e-governance information and communication. It also serves as a communication center for faculty and student alumni.
Partners
The GGC unites leading scholars in government and law, political science, public policy and administration, business administration, cross-cultural management, and area studies. Its members represent a broad cross-section of EU and US culture. EU partners represent it from north to south and are from old and new states. US partners are large and small, representing the eastern, mid-west and southern regions.
Good governance and democracy and the role of media
In a welcome note, Mr. Abdel Mouneim Osman, Director UNESCO Beirut, welcomed the participants and said that UNESCO has always tried to establish a basis for better governance and to lay a foundation for democracy. He also added that there is a great need for the right information, the correct knowledge and a better understanding of our surroundings to make better judgments and better decisions, as leaders and as followers.
In a speech, Mr. George Awad, the UNESCO Programme Officer for Communication Information (CI) said that since its establishment UNESCO has aimed at establishing freedom of speech and democracy and adopted many resolutions to support the media. He also added that UNESCO has always supported the development of media, freedom of speech and pluralism in developing countries and this workshop aims at raising awareness among young media professionals to important elements in advancing towards good governance and democracy.
In a statement the president of MADAR, Mr. Nofal Daou said that for democracy to happen the best policy is to accept on another and to adopt a policy of dialogue. He said that MADAR has adopted a policy of finding solutions rather than presenting problems in cooperation with international organizations like UNESCO. He also expressed his thanks to UNESCO for the support in making the workshop happen.
Good Governance Action Plan Workbook
This workbook has been designed so that boards are empowered to take responsibility for their own development.
It gives trustees the means to improve their governance practices. It includes lesson plans that will spark lively debate and clarify group thinking.
Framework for Good Governance
High performance boards know the importance of understanding and committing to good governance. As a means to understand, communicate, manage and measure effectiveness as a board and an organization many boards have adopted this simple governance "framework" that encompasses the many dimensions of good governance. The framework defines the purpose and interrelationship of the fundamental components of governance. It also acts as a lens through which the board can pursue and monitor its compliance and performance responsibilities. The framework also acknowledges the related yet distinct roles played by the board as a whole, each member and the board structure in living good governance every day. It does this by asking "big questions" that boards are obligated to answer.
It is a board's responsibility to ensure that robust dialogue, clear documentation and careful on-going attention is given to all of the dimensions outlined in the framework. In doing so, boards can take the necessary steps to ensure a fully integrated way of governing, both for themselves and together with other provider boards.
Framework Components
The Good Governance Framework defines the purpose and interrelationship of the fundamental components of governance. Specifically it describes the following nine (9) elements:
1.
Stakeholder Relationships
defines the nature of the key stakeholder relationships; their influence, impact and expectations of the organization and its board
2.
Board Composition
defines how and why the board members are selected as well as the role stakeholders play in board population
3.
CEO Function
defines the nature of the relationship between the board and the CEO and the expectations regarding the CEO's roles and responsibilities
4.
Board Accountability
defines the expectations placed upon the board as a whole and each of its members
5.
Board Function
defines the primary role of the board in-service to the organization and its stakeholders
6.
Fiduciary Stewardship
defines the role of the board in overseeing the fiduciary interests and investments of its stakeholders
7.
Risk & Asset Management
defines the role of the board in overseeing the organization’s principal risks and assets on behalf of its stakeholders
8.
Strategic Leadership
defines the role of the board in establishing and evolving a clear, relevant, meaningful and well understood strategic direction
9.
Board Performance Systems
defines the expectations for board processes, systems and mechanisms in supporting board performance
It is a board's responsibility to ensure that robust dialogue, clear documentation and careful on-going attention is given to all of the dimensions outlined in the framework. In doing so, boards can take the necessary steps to ensure a fully integrated way of governing, both for themselves and together with other provider boards.
The Good Governance Framework defines the purpose and interrelationship of the fundamental components of governance. Specifically it describes the following nine (9) elements:
1.
Stakeholder Relationships
defines the nature of the key stakeholder relationships; their influence, impact and expectations of the organization and its board
2.
Board Composition
defines how and why the board members are selected as well as the role stakeholders play in board population
3.
CEO Function
defines the nature of the relationship between the board and the CEO and the expectations regarding the CEO's roles and responsibilities
4.
Board Accountability
defines the expectations placed upon the board as a whole and each of its members
5.
Board Function
defines the primary role of the board in-service to the organization and its stakeholders
6.
Fiduciary Stewardship
defines the role of the board in overseeing the fiduciary interests and investments of its stakeholders
7.
Risk & Asset Management
defines the role of the board in overseeing the organization’s principal risks and assets on behalf of its stakeholders
8.
Strategic Leadership
defines the role of the board in establishing and evolving a clear, relevant, meaningful and well understood strategic direction
9.
Board Performance Systems
defines the expectations for board processes, systems and mechanisms in supporting board performance
European Leaders Attend The Good Governance Conference
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)